Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of considering fewer theoretical subjects in universities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of theory-based program in universities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive ba a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that abstract and pure science topic can be a plusو and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, knowledge-based institutes can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that breaking through for undiscovered areas, as well as the solution to modern humans' challenges, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered correct theory is base of correct practice. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both knowledge-based kinds of research and accordingly studies and discovery of resorts apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of only skill based institutes, lack of in-depth knowledge might increase the consequences of more mistakes and problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of separations of academical and vocational relate to this reality that the demerits of less theoretical pertain to low-level skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of low skill is correlated negatively with low confidence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of more theories.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of more theoretical far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77464788732 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3517797799 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661971830986 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3278842728 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152467431204 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487583037217 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0177505442592 0.071462118173 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830386644854 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156622543715 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.