Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

I agree with the following statement beacuse television has bad influence on people communication and their behiovur to others. I will explain in three different ways and also I am going to give three examples for these three branches.
Firstly, television has a power to destroyed people relationships beacuse the most of people watch television more than ten hours in a day in the world. Moreover, they can never find a time to conversation with their frends and family. For example, if I compare with my grandparents and my childhood. I can see much more differences between us and this deferences exist beacuse of television. My grandparent had close relationships each other, but I can not communicate with them beacuse of television. Most probably I watch television program normally day. And I could not find time for disscuss something with them. It shows me television has a negative effect up on people beacuse my grandparents had grown without television and they spent childhood in streets. However, my generation became adult with television and we are not be able to communicate each other or our families.
Secondly, television has terrible influence on people beacuse people can not talk with television they can only listen or watch it. In this reason people lose their communication skills. It is provide with some communication concert, this concert just tries explain basic pattern communication. Beacuse people has not enough abilities to even begin a conversation with others. For example, my cousin watches cartoons every day, he is effected by this cartoons very badly beacuse he never leaves his eyes on television screen, despite I try to communicate with him.
Thirtly, if I compare with old people and new people, I would say easly people needs much more physcologist nowadays. It is other reason television bad impact on people. They need to professional support by physcologist beacuse they had been forgotten how communicate each other since television became very significant to them. For instance, I am living in flat and I have much neighboor and the most of my neighboor has not communicate each other. However, I remamber to when I was a child, my neighboor had great releation with my family. Unfortuntely, nowadays they do not spend their family. All these reasons people need to physcologist to disscuss and try to explain their problem. But people usually did not go to this kind of place to communicate in the my childhood. They always shared their feelings with around them, but television had already destroyed it.
In the conclusion, television has bad influences on peoples' communication and I tried to explain with three examples. These examples are people watch television

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...troyed people relationships beacuse the most of people watch television more than ten hours in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ee much more differences between us and this deferences exist beacuse of television....
^^^^
Line 2, column 834, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...me adult with television and we are not be able to communicate each other or our f...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
... lose their communication skills. It is provide with some communication concert, this c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a conversation with others. For example, my cousin watches cartoons every day, he...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s cartoons every day, he is effected by this cartoons very badly beacuse he never le...
^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. They need to professional support by physcologist beacuse they had been forgo...
^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'communicated'.
Suggestion: communicated
...or and the most of my neighboor has not communicate each other. However, I remamber to when...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 660, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple need to physcologist to disscuss and try to explain their problem. But people...
^^
Line 4, column 762, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'my'?
Suggestion: the; my
...to this kind of place to communicate in the my childhood. They always shared their fee...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9713003758 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463963963964 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2632502627 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4444444444 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92592592593 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203713327796 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700875470796 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043613842853 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13947546511 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135035496676 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.