There is no need for newspapers in the modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the need for newspaper and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of the news industry is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that modern society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, the digital newspapers might provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the news essentiality, as well as the social news, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between the popular newspapers and modern life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both news policies and the effect of newspaper on the world apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the traditional newspapers might increase the consequences of fake news. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the forged news could relate to this reality that the demerits of the political newspapers, pertain to the negative effects of news. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the news necessity is correlated negatively with paper-based newspapers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of newspapers production.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the newspaper in the modern world far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the global news industry prove the significance of the role of newspaper in personal life, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40559440559 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13349924942 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5520918576 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148658310264 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570386742444 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045917186075 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931993221217 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377385502763 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.