It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to become prosperous and successful in their job position and get a higher promotion and salary. Whereas some individuals debate that carrying out extraordinary work and assignment lead to a person get a higher promotion and salary in his job, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that taking part in the group works actively is a more momentous factor in comparison to additional tasks. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by the underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, no one casts a shadow of doubt on the fact that participating actively in a research group improves people’s knowledge about different topics, enhances the level of creativity in an individual and considerably leads to getting much experience. The mentioned three factors are definitely important for every boss to give a higher promotion and salary to his employees. An example can significantly shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, according to my fathers’ advice, I participated in a research group at the University of Melbourne. The group meeting held by the members of that scientific group helped me improve the level of creativity in mine, increase general information about electrical engineering, and also have a scientific view toward unfamiliar topics. Consequently, when I applied for a job opportunity in the Tesla Company, I was hired and after several months, the boss gave me a higher promotion and salary because he assigned me as the head of the engineering department there. As a result, if I did not participate in those group meeting, I would have not been able to improve my knowledge in electrical engineering and would have not gotten a higher promotion and salary.
Moreover, it is crystal clear that one of the paramount and significant points of taking part in group work is that the individual can easily connect to some other well-educated and prestigious persons who may have strong and great connections outside of the group. Under such a circumstance, that person is readily hired in a large company with a higher promotion and income. Consequently, besides improving and enhancing his knowledge and curriculum vitae in that research group and he can also earn much more money. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned examples, it is noteworthy to mention that in one of the group meetings, I became familiar with Professor. Johnson, who was the head of the engineering department in the Tesla Company. He really assisted me to get a higher promotion rapidly in only two months. This is because he knew that I am actually good in mechanical and electrical engineering, and furthermore, he had a relatively great comprehending of my abilities as a great leader. Therefore, after his retirement, he assigned me as his replacement.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that if a person wants to increase his revenue as well as get a higher promotion, it is more important for him to participate in teamwork rather than doing additional work. This is because he is able to be in contact with famous and renowned individuals, who have already great connections outside of the research group, and also it improves the persons’ knowledge and creativity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3010.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 585.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1452991453 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17142438766 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478632478632 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 971.1 618.680645161 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3601087418 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.818181818 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5909090909 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248100724459 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062975752175 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573871156571 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15799211156 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344167117703 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.