when there is a new technological device available, some people will buy it immediately, while others will wait until many others have adopted it. Which view do you agree more.

It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human being are always striving to purchase a new and high-tech device in order to facilitate their daily tasks by using that product. Whereas some individuals debate that buying a new product immediately is very important and they do not wait for a short time, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that they buy it when the device was used by the other people broadly. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude, believing that it is more important for all persons to wait for a short period for purchasing a new technological device. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.

To commence with, it is no secret to anyone that when a new product is produced, it has several errors and bugs, and moreover, those problems will be solved by the producer by passing time. Under such a circumstance, it would be better for all individuals to wait and observe the advantages and disadvantages of that product. An example can shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, the Apple Company released IOS 9 for iPhone 6s. In the beginning, this software had lots of problems and the majority of people discussed that their cell phone was stopped abruptly. In such a situation, the company published an announcement that the bugs would be solved immediately, as a result, I waited for a couple of months and did not purchase that article. If I purchased it at that time when it was released as a new technological device, I would distinctly have had lots of difficulties with my cell phone.

Furthermore, as a matter of fact, one of the most paramount points is that while a new commodity is introduced by a company, it is very expensive and its price is at the top. Therefore, it is not logical and reasonable for any person to buy that article because its cost will be gradually reduced. An example can drive this notion home dramatically. In the aforementioned example, I did not buy iPhone 6s exactly when it was inaugurated to people by Apple Company. This is because I knew that its software has lots of problems and its cost is relatively high and is not rational. Consequently, I bought that cell phone after a short period when its price had declined sufficiently.

To wrap it up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that if they really decide to buy a new advanced technology device, It will be great for individuals to wait for a short period. This is because the price of that product will decrease in a short time and also, its problems will be resolved by the producer.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, as a matter of fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74636174636 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92550240498 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471933471933 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3341221421 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.157894737 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3157894737 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250529804911 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711471964127 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540095783969 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159002153394 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413174630533 0.0645574589148 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.