It goes without saying in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to become successful and prosperous in his job by doing challenging investigations. Whereas some individuals debate that working for a company having uninteresting projects along with more vacations days are more preferable than hiring in a company with high-tech projects and interesting issue having fewer vacation days, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that this phenomenon is not totally enjoyable. This group really thinks it would be better to work for a company with lots of challenging projects. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that one of the most paramount benefits of working for a prestigious company with the challenging project is that employees are able to be involved in other complicated investigations which definitely help them gain much experience in that field of study, enhance their knowledge, and have a great scientific view towards different subjects. This issue actually gives rise to a person inviting larger projects from a financial standpoint. As a result, that guy will be obviously successful and wealthy in the near future. An example can shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, I hired Tesla Company as a mechanical engineer. However, I did not have much time holidays to rest and I worked for 8 hours each day. This issue helped me become familiar with different topics in my field of study and improve my knowledge. Eventually, I recognized some intelligent and well-educated persons in that company and was invited to a huge project. That project really made me buy a BMW in only 2 years.
Moreover, it is no secret to anyone that if a person works for a prestigious and well-known company with fewer vacations for a long period, the manager of that company will provide several great opportunities in the near future for the person. This is because the manager absolutely knows him as a diligent person, and moreover, if he loses that person, his job will be stopped for a short period. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, the head of the engineering department found that I am really good at AutoCAD software which is able to do lots of complex projects. Consequently, he increased my income and also provided a great opportunity for me to travel to Australia for 2 weeks with my family. This considerably stimulated me to save energy and also become stronger to do more projects when I get back to work.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that it would be better for almost all individuals to work for a company with challenging projects and fewer holidays. This is because it helps them enhance their knowledge and find better opportunities in the future, and also the manager keeps that individual as a hard worker in his mind.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2653.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03415559772 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00914786159 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514231499051 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.0448796152 48.9658058833 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.590909091 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9545454545 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192389326565 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513167121728 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054896275695 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127719411898 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662532013517 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.