A controversial debate is often raised about the qualities of a good leader. Some groups of people may hold the view that a good leader should implement his own ideas and thoughts. Others may have an opposing view and feel that a good leader should listen to other employees views. From vantage point, I concur with the latter groups for the reason that I address in this essay.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that active listener leader encourages employees to share their thoughts. It is crystal clear that two brains think much better than one brain! Leaders who do not share their thoughts with others end up having an inexperienced, demotivated and unsuccessful team. However, a leader who share his thoughts with other can enjoy being part of a winning team. Ultimately, all members of the team would be successful.
The second reason which deserves some thought is that active listener leader encourages cooperation between team members. Cooperation between team members can create synergy which eventually leads to the achievement of objectives. Without this team spirit members of the team cannot thrive. A vivid example to illustrate my view point is the outstanding sales achievement that my team and I were able to accomplish in 2016. Because of the wise vision and wisdom my leader who encouraged each member to share the thoughts, we able to achieve such an outstanding results.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason which is worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible result of a study that was published in the American business Journal which showed that active listener leaders have significantly higher chances of increasing company's profits. This study was conducted on 120 companies in different sectors to avoid bias.
Contemplating the aforementioned reason, one soon realizes that active listener leaders can build a better successful team. Moreover, not only will they be able enhance cooperation between team members, but also to increase company's profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'result'?
Suggestion: result
... we able to achieve such an outstanding results. Although the aforementioned reasons...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20114942529 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80615770633 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8054131259 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2631578947 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160149259437 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537084214331 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067446124896 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956171205312 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876446966579 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.