Mixed opinions exist among people in relation to how globalization influences the economies of the world. With this trend, an increasing number of multinational companies have been established for the prosperity of their businesses. As a result, some people argue that they have destroyed the environment relating to them. In my view, I argue with this argument; whereas, some companies have also dedicated themselves to corporate social responsibility.
To begin with, the growing industrialization indeed deeply influences nature. In order to pursue lower operational expenses, some companies set up subsidiary companies and factories overseas, which boosted the construction of infrastructure and housing in the local community. Nevertheless, it was factories usually release toxic gases and polluted water into the air and surrounding river. Furthermore, cities have formed center on these factories, which leads to an increase of autos with more exhaust gases. All the elements aforementioned have a detrimental effect on the environment.
On the other hand, nowadays, more companies are aware of their responsibility towards society. For instance, a factory manufactured mobile phones in Taiwan advocated lowering carbon footprint, reducing the frequency of air-conditioning, decreasing the usage of paper, and forming a paperless office. They have to take these measures for years, and not only have they succeed, but also brought a positive influence towards other companies.
By way of conclusion, while some multinational companies do harm to the local environment only for the benefits of themselves, other companies still contribute themselves to improving the environment and lowering the destruction they have caused.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, nevertheless, so, still, whereas, while, for instance, as a result, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86220472441 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32820637189 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629921259843 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5462469123 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.538461538 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145163820184 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534002350924 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399791798162 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887665065037 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296076049429 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.