TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading claims that it is impossible to maintain a permanent human on the conditions of Venus and provides three reasons for this claim. While the professor believes that keeping human in Venus is completely possible and rejects the reading's reasons as follows.
Firstly, the reading affirms that at Venus's surface the atmospheric pressure is extremely high and humans can be crushed by this pressure. Controversy, the professor explains that for dealing with this problem a spacecraft such as balloon can flowed at the 50 KM above the Venus. Since, the pressure at such level is similar to the earth.
Secondly, the reading reckons that another problem is that the lack of water and oxygen at the Venus which is necessary for living humans. In contrast, the professor points out that the atmosphere of Venus is created from chemical components which can be used for producing water and O2.
Eventually, although, the reading affirms that there is a little sun light at this planet, the professor introduces that the clouds at the atmosphere of this plant are not very thick and the surface riches sunlight. Furthermore, by installing solar power on the spacecraft based on the sunlight reflection by the thick clouds the electricity can be produced.
To sum up, for those reasons the professor refuses the reading's reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an flowed at the 50 KM above the Venus. Since, the pressure at such level is similar ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'riches'' or 'rich's'?
Suggestion: riches'; rich's
...lant are not very thick and the surface riches sunlight. Furthermore, by installing so...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09589041096 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66933156391 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7216158815 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300279088119 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124304959501 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473639455 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15522380521 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756870902667 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.