The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph provides the data on the portion of households in rented and owned houses in Wales and England from 1918 to 2011. Overall, it is clear that the number of owned households increased, while the number of rented houses decreased.
The most notable point is that more and more people tended to have their own houses. Specifically, the percentage of owned households begun at roughly 22 % in 1918, followed by at approximately 32 % in 1939 and 1953. The owned household portion steadily rose at from 40 % to about 69 % between 1961 and 2001. After that, the ratio declined a little bit roughly 64 % in 2011.
Another thing to note is that people were less likely to rent their houses. Looking more closely, for example, the portion of rented houses was approximately 76 % in 1918, and then ti kept about 67% at 1939 and 1953. From 1953 to 2001, the percentage rate of rented households continued to decrease, and in 2011, the rate recovered a bit to roughly 35 %.
Interestingly, in 1971, the portion of rented and owned was the same at 50 % in 1971.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... 2001. After that, the ratio declined a little bit roughly 64 % in 2011. Another thing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, while, another thing, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71351351351 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60517186655 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1344600097 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209476104438 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896164228941 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645861862679 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133872625655 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057789832281 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.