The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

The graph given illustrates the information in term of amount of discharge carbon dioxide waste by four different nations, namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal over the courses of 40 years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the figure for both the United Kingdom and Sweden had a downward trend in emiting the CO2 each person whereas there was an opposite pattern in the other countries.
In 1967, the U.K people hit the highest point in the average CO2 emissions, roughly 11 metric tonnes while Sweden and Italy were lower than, about 9 and around 5, respectively. Stood at 1 metric tonne, each Portuguese had the carbon dioxide gas reached the lowest point at the period.
Regard the volume of average CO2 individually of 30 years were witnessed considerable growth in Italy and Portugal before remaining stably in 2007, just under 8 and over 5, respectively. By contrast, there was an opposite tendency with the emission in the U.K and Sweden. The average CO2 in the U.K reduced significantly to 9 metric tonnes in 2007. Meanwhile, there was a rapid fluctuation in emission in Sweden before decreasing sharply to 5 metric tonnes per head.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...in the other countries. In 1967, the U.K people hit the highest point in the ave...
^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...ite tendency with the emission in the U.K and Sweden. The average CO2 in the U.K ...
^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
....K and Sweden. The average CO2 in the U.K reduced significantly to 9 metric tonne...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94358974359 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65363680581 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5530352699 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382061108723 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142168125586 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569078725024 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200194950911 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519392094225 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.