Based on given materials, the article as well as lecture discusses a technology which is named turtle excluder device (TED) could helps endangered sea turtle species to escape from nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. The author states that this method could not be effective cause three reasons. That being said, the lecturer provides several responses to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that sea turtles get trapped very rarely and based on statistics, it is estimated that on average, one shrimp boat accidentally catches about one turtle every month. However, the lecturer explains that it is true fact ,but population of turtles are very small. Furthermore, there are several boats prey in the specific zone of sea. Consequently, more than 1000 turtle are caught every year and it is huge. On the other, losing few shrimps in the sea do not influence the shrimp industry.
Second, the writer proclaims that there are some alternative methods instead of TED. Yet again, the speaker underscores other alternatives. The writer purpose to shorten the time limit that shrimp boats are allowed to keep their nets underwater. But, the speaker thinks it is just a theory since patrol boards cannot monitor all the time limit of the boats. Based on this response, it is useless and impractical theory.
The final point of contention between the reading and listening passages is effectiveness of TED for larger species of endangered sea turtles. The author thinks it could not help larger species to escape from the nets even if the nets are equipped with TEDs. On the other hand, the speaker explains that by some modifying on the original TED, it is no longer be a problem. Furthermore, She continues that based on the size of turtle in specific zone, they could change TEDs and shake them out to functional matters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
... named turtle excluder device TED could helps endangered sea turtle species to escape...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e lecturer explains that it is true fact ,but population of turtles are very small...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05901639344 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60263856358 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.076334935 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4375 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.