Community service enables students to acquire life skills and knowledge, as well as provide a service to those who need it most. It has been a debatable issue if unpaid volunteerism should be added to curriculum of pupils. This essay will discuss why this type of services should not be included in the high school study.
Certain people opine that these free services should be involved in class schedule of their wards. The major reason behind it is that they believe such activity is very much helpful in developing an increased sense of local responsibility- a global view of a society and a heart for 'giving back' and 'helping others'. For instance, a survey conducted by World Education Society in United States in 2017 yielded a result that students participating in free voluntary work were found to be more interested in helping the deserved folks. In addition, these are helpful in improving lifelong communication, interpersonal and critical thinking skills. Thus, addition of such campaigns can be proven to be beneficial to the children.
However, I believe that if it has pros, it has cons too. Predominantly, these kinds of aids divert the concentration of pupils from their studies. Since these activities needs a lot of time, students will not get proper time to devote to important subjects like Mathematics, Science, English, et cetera, which are far more prominent in building their future. For instance, a community service generally takes a whole day in order to serve the people with their requirements; wasting one complete scheduled day of a pupil. That is why; these aids should not be added in school timetable.
In conclusion, this essay argued why the addition of community services in high school is insignificant. In my opinion, this help is essential for poor people, but it should not be practiced on the sake of the future of present generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87561987715 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592948717949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7306700345 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202123146772 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661975332388 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348824798327 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122965954738 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218785268205 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.