The tow bar charts below illustrate the distinction of graduate and postgraduate among four sections after leaving the United Kingdom college in 2008
As can be obviously realized, both graduates and postgraduates trended to seek future study; voluntary work, however, had the lowest inclination among tow groups.
Having studied the given graduates' chart, one can definitely figure out that most students decided to study the future approximately 30000 person which was significantly more than those who decided to do voluntary work with the amount of 3500 people. However, the rate of students who get part-time jobs vaguely resembles unemployment. They had different nearly 1500 men.
Moreover, the postgraduate student who decided to continue education, have very close amount by part-time workers. We can observe the lowest number for people who worked as volunteers, which was well under 350. The number of unemployment gets third position at this graph with 165 postgraduate students.
Generally speaking, most educated people trend to continue to study. We could realize by this inclination people get a better full-time job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...to study the future approximately 30000 person which was significantly more than those...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58620689655 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83603075068 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695402298851 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 88.0535751617 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237567519575 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793761417012 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649855285208 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128832225645 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737082492725 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.