Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
In our sophisticated world, it is a controversial issue for the governments to select the areas they want to support financially. I think it is critically important to invest in space traveling and space exploration. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
To begin with, funding space travel and exploration may lead to discoveries about space and new scientific achievements in various areas such as cosmology, astronomy, and geology. The more the government allocates money to science, the more scientists would be encouraged to attempt and focus on research. In our modern era, knowledge is power with no doubt. A compelling example demonstrates this fact is my government that invested money in nanotechnology that made innumerable scientists motivated to study in this field. As a result, my country is currently a leading country in nanotechnology.
Another equally significant point is that when the government spends money on exploring space, it can result in new technologies that are economically beneficial. A large number of prosperous industries all over the globe seemed strange at first glance but flourished after being supported for a while. For instance, I have a smart friend who wanted to found a company and produce his novel special electronic tools ten years ago. His innovative ideas seemed naïve at the beginning and attracted almost no one. However, his uncle gave him a large amount of money and he established his company with that money. After two years, the company started thriving and currently my friend is extremely rich. Had his uncle not invested that money, my friend wouldn't gain success and wealth now.
To make a long story short, I firmly believe that it is important for the government to fund space issues. That's because it can have a major contribution not only to the scientific progression but also to earning a huge amount of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easons to elaborate on my standpoint. To begin with, funding space travel and ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a leading country in nanotechnology. Another equally significant point is tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 164, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...ogies that are economically beneficial. A large number of prosperous industries all over the glob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 750, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ncle not invested that money, my friend wouldnt gain success and wealth now. To m...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wouldnt gain success and wealth now. To make a long story short, I firmly bel...
^^^^
Line 17, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...or the government to fund space issues. Thats because it can have a major contributio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21135646688 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04381914 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599369085174 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2353951889 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239050132055 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695962109553 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662035081577 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150435942713 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039036444825 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.