You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect.
Write a letter to the editor of the magazine. In your letter
correct the information in the article
explain why it is important for the magazine to give correct information
suggest what the magazine should do about this situation
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing with regard to an article that was published in the latest issue of Planet Travel. I have always been enjoying reading your magazine, however, there is a mistake in the article "The History of Cambridge".
In the article, the year when the city of Cambridge was established was put an incorrect number. It is supposed to be 1960 according to the text book we learnt in school.
I would like to draw your attention to this issue because an international magazine is not supposed to make the mistake like this. People from all over the world have access to the articles in your magazine and they are taking it as both a travel guide and source of information. Thus, people are expecting something informative and accurate. Mistakes like this is definitely misleading.
May I suggest that the information was corrected in the next issue in a special section to make sure that it is noticeable to everyone reading the magazine? I hope you could take my suggestion into consideration.
Yours faithfully,
BB AA
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, thus, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 32.9175257732 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 937.175257732 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99444444444 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92251265984 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5229155528 44.8134815571 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7272727273 76.5299724578 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 16.8248392259 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 4.34317383033 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26472775323 0.216113520407 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818031989672 0.0766984524023 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498996975435 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131821808212 0.12726935374 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568799371216 0.0580467560999 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 8.37731958763 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.