Some people think it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. Other people it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Some people think that friends should always share the same thoughts, while others believe that friends could have different opinions once a while.
On one hand, sharing the same thoughts with friends will make people feel that there is always someone on their side and support them. Having the same thoughts is why people become friend at the very beginning. When friends think alike, it is easier to put themselves in each other’s shoes. Especially when they meet with some difficulties, their friends may come up with the solution very quickly.
On the other hand, different thoughts from friends could increase the diversity of daily life. People may get bored if their friend always think the same as they do all the time. To have different opinion does not mean a breach of friendship. Disagreement is not always a bad thing. Nothing will lose if you open your mind to different thoughts, and perhaps you will get inspired on the ideas you initially disagree.
In my opinion, I would love to hear different opinions from my friends because they may have something that I could not think of or I do not know. Most of the time there is no right or wrong to one question. Because of the close relationship I have with my friends, I am willing to hear their real thoughts, instead of only the ones I agree with. In turn, they will not be reluctant to tell me what they are actually thinking since they know my door is always open. Being willing to hear different opinions will benefit friendship in the long run.
To conclusion, there is no problem to have friend who always share the same opinion, but different thoughts may also lead to a friendship that values the diversity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l benefit friendship in the long run. To conclusion, there is no problem to ha...
^^^^
Line 17, column 44, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'friended'.
Suggestion: friended
...conclusion, there is no problem to have friend who always share the same opinion, but ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77364864865 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43991903433 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7663861048 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361218362773 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126058836385 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896518571316 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235543520173 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073789882713 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.