The reading and the lecture are both about a research which had done on the fossil of Tyrannosaurus rex or T. rex and the discovery of some materials from breaking its leg bone. The author in the reading provides three reason to prove that there are materials that shows the remains of blood vessel, red blood cells and collagen matrix of T.rex. The lecturer on the other hand, provides some explanation to refuse each claim separately.
First of all, the author in the text mentions that there are many empty holes that disclose the bone blood vessel and there is some smooth and pliable organic material inside them. The professor in the lecture rejects the idea given by text by asserting that there are some bacteria colonize in and create hollow structures and that soft and flexible materials could be the residue of those bacteria.
Secondly, it is mentioned in the text that some spheres that can be the remnant of blood vessels are disclosed by microscopic assessment. As a result of the test, The spheres had reddish color iron. The instructor in the lecture posits that this issues are not a reliable sources to prove blood cell residue, he added that that reddish material can be the reddish mineral.
Finally, the author in the text contends that collagen is found as a result of researchers' test. So, that shows the remnant of collagen in the leg bone of T. rex. The professor, however, asserts that collagen can not las more than 1000 years but this fossil is related to 70 million years ago. He added that those animals do not contain collagen, it may be related to human skin or researchers who was handling the fossil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ood cells and collagen matrix of T.rex. The lecturer on the other hand, provides so...
^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the test, The spheres had reddish color iron. The instructor in the lecture posi...
^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... found as a result of researchers test. So, that shows the remnant of collagen in the le...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7212543554 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3882825325 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1256983351 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.