Nowadays, politician members have been concentrating about how to cure diseases and try to focus on them instead of putting lots of both efforts and budgets on maintaining educational purposes in order to elude disease from happening. As far as I’m concerned, I lean toward this statement and two point of views will be conspicuous in this essay.
First and foremost, some people would argue that in order to cope with these circumstances government should provide a considerably amount of budgets on education and increases the knowledge of students. In addition, hiring a sophisticated and well-known teachers would have a vital impact on scholars. Full consensus has been available among people which one the most principal attribute of governments is they should destruct a study underlying of teaching methods and it leads students to remove hurdles at health science as well as invent useful instructions to distinguish every single illnesses.
On the other hand, some people have an another perception which believe putting a budget on academic part is trivial and try to elude from this approach. Furthermore, a strong contribution in cure is needed for instance an advanced tools for removing tumors out of the brain or a serious deed to bolster MRI’s system. From my point of view, this kind of perception just puts a strain on subjects because having an sbility to prevent diseases to occur always has an impressive accomplishment rather than cure them. Lack of knowledge about how to prevent some viruses to get spreading is prone nations to go in a destructive way.
Overall, it can be seen that if government regards prevention as the most fundamental criteria, it stands to reason that the situations will get better and also avoid society to be deteriorated later on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'circumstances'' or 'circumstance's'?
Suggestion: circumstances'; circumstance's
... argue that in order to cope with these circumstances government should provide a considerabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
...circumstances government should provide a considerably amount of budgets on education and increases t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a perception' or 'another perception'.
Suggestion: a perception; another perception
... On the other hand, some people have an another perception which believe putting a budget on acade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'tool'?
Suggestion: tool
...cure is needed for instance an advanced tools for removing tumors out of the brain or...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...uts a strain on subjects because having an sbility to prevent diseases to occur al...
^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive way" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to get spreading is prone nations to go in a destructive way. Overall, it can be seen that if gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15358361775 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94389127246 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634812286689 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5396446863 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0653760457621 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251015925764 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.017694089092 0.0667982634062 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0390306066049 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020898097978 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.