More information available online so library books are useless Agree or disagree with statement

Essay topics:

More information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with statement.

The importance of more information is available online which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that it is very beneficial for the people as they can find any information with one click. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that sometimes people face difficulties to find any information from the books so that time online available information is very helpful. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that, online information is given in various ways so people can understand easily. Besides, they can find any information with one click and it also saves the time of people. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of online information are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06329113924 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75356464429 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548523206751 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6696352891 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.090909091 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211984683988 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793831137864 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803284181439 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130894576883 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313666466939 0.0609392437508 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.