working four days instead of five
The author interprets about the benefit of working four days instead of five days. To be specific, he gives three reasons to allow employ to work for four days. On the contrary, speaker of the listening section does not agree with this statement and clarifies it with giving his opinion on it.
In the beginning writer says that if company allows employ to work only for four days, it has to pay less and they will get more rest and alert for their work. It has less chances to make mistakes in work and it has to pay less which is profitable for organization. Where as speaker goes against it and says that company needs to spend much more money for hiring new employee and has to provide medical benefit, training, more office space and computer which costs more than current situation.
Secondly, according to writer's view, providing four hours helps to reduce unemployment rate. But in this case, speaker opposes by saying employers may expect same work as before though employees are working four days and think they can do the same amount in four days. Furthermore they may be asked to work for overtime so there is no hope for reducing unemployment.
Finally, author of the essay believes for the quality time of the workers as the get more time after working only for four days and they can spend their extra time with family. But on the other hand, lecturer refuses and and says only working four days may have chances of not upgrading career growth. Moreover, employees who are working for five days have chances of getting management position in the office.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e rest and alert for their work. It has less chances to make mistakes in work and it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...s which is profitable for organization. Where as speaker goes against it and says that c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ey can do the same amount in four days. Furthermore they may be asked to work for overtime ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...But on the other hand, lecturer refuses and and says only working four days may have ch...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71739130435 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28626346472 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.953573992 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37572774987 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163317894598 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151306433231 0.0662205650399 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246972713437 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923569756888 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.