The pie chart below shows tge results of a survey of the causes foor poor learning outcomes in schools in a particularly country in 2011

The pie chart presents a survey which outlines why the pupils of a school in a specific country in 2011 were poorly performed.

Overall, it is obvious that inexpert teachers were the main reason why pupils had wretched outcomes in learning, while the absence of revision was not so important in schoolgoers’ learning of this country in 2011.

As the poll data suggests, the 35% of attribution to young students’ inadequate performance was made to unskilled educators. The second reason was indicated towards the upbringing of the children, as it was denoted as 27%. Moreover, students were affected negatively in their learning by their working parents as 20% poll results were linked to this reason.

Inadequate facilities and lack of revision were the two less influencing reasons of the students’ poor learning. In specific, the unsatisfactory performance was affected by the poor facilities of the schools by 10%, whereas the lack of revision affected the bad performance of pupils by 8% according to the outcomes of the survey.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccording to the outcomes of the survey.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00132245984 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9825362939 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189863158423 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891348446783 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949729801707 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138105359193 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955264242731 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.