Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, we are livinig in an advanced technological era, which has changed various aspects of our lives. Some people think that government should focus on the other requirments rather than the internet, while others hold a positive perspective toward the fact that internet access is more important than public transportation, for instance. I strongly subscribe to this group and I believe that government should pay attention to fortify the internet accessibility for whole society.
To begin with, regarding to the rapid growth of society's needs, having a well-connected internet is an imperative. Presently, people are chiefly using their own cars instead of using commiunal trasportation systems, so it is not as crucial for them as an reliable access to the internet. As an illustration, take Covid-19 pandemic as a compelling example. Since last year, when the first case of Corona Virus has been proved, all the companies have asked their employees to stay at their homes, and work remotely. In this case, people need a very strong, confident internet connection to do their jobs in an effective way. Moreover, they prefere to drive their own cars to protect themselevs from any danger of Covid-19. Consequently, the use of public transportation is lessening gradually. This example demonstrate how it is lucrative and important for society to have a very well internet access, which shows government must allocate more budget on internet instead of public transportation.
Furtheremore, nowadays, the internet taxi is growing quickly. Uber, for instance is the well-known kind of the internet transportation system. People use their mobile's internet to find the nearest Uber to reach to their distinations in a more convinent and faster way. Therefore, their needs of the internet outweigh their requirement of government's transportation systems.
To put it in a nutshell, I firmly believe that government should spend money to enhance the internet quality than improve public transportation. Many specific situations such as Covid-19 demontrates how the internet is momentous for people than any kind of public transportation. In addition, the internet taxi like Uber is becoming more popular tham other transportation systems available in the society, which need the internet as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ms, so it is not as crucial for them as an reliable access to the internet. As an ...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'reliable access'.
Suggestion: reliable access
...ms, so it is not as crucial for them as an reliable access to the internet. As an illustration, ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nt internet connection to do their jobs in an effective way. Moreover, they prefere to drive their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43175487465 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12647013859 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559888579387 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4966082035 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279964019691 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909130332927 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706867320674 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181883606978 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447874426729 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.