Among many school subjects, there is an argument about which lecture is the most important. Some people opine that History is the most significant subject, where others believe that Science and Technology is the most crucial lesson. I agree with both views that both lectures are equally important.
History is a school subject which teaches its learners about past occurrences. It can include expeditions, wars, and independence. From these past events, there are important life and moral values that can be applied in students' life. For instance, as an Indonesian, I was taught about how Indonesia troops struggled to reach Indonesia's independence. From their endeavor story, I can learn about persistence and commitment in striving to get what they want. Although these moral values are taken from past stories, they are still applicable in my life now.
Meanwhile, Science and Technology subject is usually related to high-technology things. It teaches its learners to utilize those high-technology things maximally. For instance, I was taught about how to compute using Microsoft Excel, a computer software, during my Information Technology lesson on my elementary school days. When I finally got into a university and had to solve complex calculations, these Microsoft Excel was very useful in helping me to solve those complex calculations. Moreover, Science and Technology subject also encourages its learner to understand how something works. It helps students to be acknowledged about the process behind something. This can be understanding how hydraulic pipe works in car washing machine or how hot air balloon can fly.
In conclusion, I agree that both History and Science and Technology subjects are equally important, because History teaches its learners about past occurrences while Science and Technology teaches its learners to utilize those high-technology things maximally. Moreover, Science and Technology subject also encourages its learner to understand how something works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... the process behind something. This can be understanding how hydraulic pipe works in car washing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59868421053 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99722141638 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8052176051 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223130009396 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739222496885 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840016875171 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156713313762 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786312023258 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.