Life on Mars
In this set of material, the article strongly postulates that Mars could ber possible next planet to live as resources on earths are in dearth, and provide three characteristics to endorse its idea. However, the lecture mentions that reading arguments are dubious and unconvincing, and gainsays each of them
To begin with, the writer asserts that there is probability of liquid water presence on the Mars as suggested by scertain elements found by radar mission on the surface of the Mars. This was confirmed after observing the electromagnetic rays returned from the poles of Mars. On the other hand, the speaker posits this claim by insisting that liquid water can not be possible under the poles of mars. As the temperature of the mars was extremely cold about-7 degree unlike swarmer earth's surface . Therfore, in that freezing temperature water cannot exist in liquid form. Moreover mars is not geologically active, so maintainence of liquid state is not possible and elements could be different than water.
Furthermore, the lecturer contradicts by insisting that mars atmoshere is too harsh for humans to live. Though microbes can be grown in that extreme weather conditions, human body is weker and can not tolerate the harshness of weather. On top, the weather variability could either freeze the human body or burnt it because mars surface is 100 times denser than earth too. Thses claims clearly refutes the writer's implication that human living oin earthg can endure the mars environment and proved that by growth of micro organisms on mars surface.
Ultimately, the writer wraps up its arguments by declaring that methane gas was found on mars and that gas is of paramount importance for human survival on mars. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an issue with that by declaring that there was no methan sign on mars. Or if mathene is present it was in extremely limited amount that it could not be conseidered for survival. In addition, an upgraded instrument wurs had confirmed that presence of methane is not observed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ot be possible under the poles of mars. As the temperature of the mars was extreme...
^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t-7 degree unlike swarmer earths surface . Therfore, in that freezing temperature ...
^^
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ture water cannot exist in liquid form. Moreover mars is not geologically active, so mai...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ossible and elements could be different than water. Furthermore, the lecturer contr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...h too. Thses claims clearly refutes the writers implication that human living oin earth...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73047344093 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9810867721 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169269835781 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603944699311 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609593915199 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993479403388 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439479599784 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.