life on mars
In this set of materials, the reading and lecture both discuss Mars to be next candidate planet to live in. The article strongly postulates that there are certain characteristics features of Mars that has indicated existnace of life could be possible on Mars, and provide three reasons to endorse its idea. However, the professor in the lecture mentions those reason are dubious and called them as an impractical approach, and gainsays each of them.
The first and foremost, the writer begins by asserting that signs of liquid water are detected by electromegnetic radiations on the mars, and water in essential for human life. Therefore,life can be started on the mars. On the other hand, the lecturer dismisses this point by indicating that earth is active planet and it's atmosphere is warm that can support the presence of water. First of allthe water presence is not confirmed, Second , even if the water is present, The mars atmosphere is extremely cold that water cannot exist in liquid form because of high pressure. Hence, dismisses the reading claim.
Furthermore, the professor posits that it is possible that microbes could survive on the Mars, but human are not microbes. To be more specific, human are weak and their body cannot support the extreme weather conditions of mars. This is due to the reason that mars is a hundred time less dense than earth and there is significant difference of tempertaure at the Mars. Therefore, either humans will burn or freeze on the surface of Mars. These claims clearly refute the writer's implication that life could be possible on mars as mars supports the microbes of the eath.
Ultimatelty, the writer wraps up its argument by dclaring that curosity rover has found methane on mars and methane is valuable source to support the life.Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an issue with that by contending that data collected from Curosity rover is not accurate. Only European research was accurate that indicated very less amount of methane, which could not support life.Furthmore, after that methane presence was not confirmed. Consequently, this reason is not persuasive too
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , life
...r in essential for human life. Therefore,life can be started on the mars. On the othe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... water presence is not confirmed, Second , even if the water is present, The mars ...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...f Mars. These claims clearly refute the writers implication that life could be possible...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Not
... is valuable source to support the life.Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an iss...
^^^
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthmore
...f methane, which could not support life.Furthmore, after that methane presence was not co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10315186246 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74601752451 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3888976379 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3125 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268270379721 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799925489395 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107124939984 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172656686377 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045173175332 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.