Buzzers
In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates that buzzing, as a form of personal advertising, shouldn't continue for its negative aspects, and provides three reasons to endorse this idea. On the other hand, the professor states that buzzing should continue for it's benefits, and gainsays each ot the arguments mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, when people don't know that someone is being paid to do publicity, the buzzers will most likely lie by giving consumers incorrect information and thus, they will be misled. Nonetheless, the lectures maintains that this isn't true, in view of the buzzer's previous personal experience that they have with the product, since companies would only hire people who regularly use the product and already love it, making everything the buzzer say true, which deviates from ordinary advertisement.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points out that customers don't believe everything they hear, on the contrary, they ask a lot of questions before their purchase, with things regarding price, service and longevity of the product, so, if buzzers don't know the answer, the consumer will not buy. These claims refute the writer`s implications that people are less critical, attentive and sharp minded when faced with buzzers, just because they do not know these people are advertising.
Ultimately, the article wraps his arguments by declaring that civilization would likely become affected as social interaction would suffer, as the lying of the buzzers would consequently generate mistrust in people. The speaker in the listening rebuts this point by insisting that this cannot happen, in result of the fact that if a company is selling a bad product, there wouldn't even be buzzers to promote it, after all they would only promote something they use, and that's why people would ultimately become more trustful and open towards others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ing, as a form of personal advertising, shouldnt continue for its negative aspects, and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the author of the excerpt, when people dont know that someone is being paid to do p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...eless, the lectures maintains that this isnt true, in view of the buzzers previous p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cture further points out that customers dont believe everything they hear, on the co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ongevity of the product, so, if buzzers dont know the answer, the consumer will not ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...company is selling a bad product, there wouldnt even be buzzers to promote it, after al...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ld only promote something they use, and thats why people would ultimately become more...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, after all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63832515536 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 21.2450331126 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5258696461 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 205.375 110.228320801 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.75 21.698381199 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.625 7.06452816374 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201643046018 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873444197675 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751740973539 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117723426781 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087857787198 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.9 13.3589403974 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 53.8541721854 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.498013245 164% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.