Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?

It has often been argued that distinct behavior has been noticed with the advancement of technology in lives. Technology has forced people to follow the practical path rather, thinking from heart and has forced people to see benefits in relationship. In my opinion, every development has pros and cons, so the commencement of artificial intelligence has given benefits on larger scale.

To begin with, it has commonly been noticed that in the current era people has adopted the technicality in there day to day life. There was a time when people used to wait longer to get the reply from friends, relatives or their loved ones, however, this waiting time has been cut down to zero with the evolvement of different messaging apps. For instance, a well-known chatting application called watsapp has given the people leverage to talk in seconds. Not only people can message and talk but also the facility of video calling through another software called skype has made people realize that a person living abroad is not far, they seems with us the right moment. Therefore, technology has made people maintain their relationship in their busy schedule as well.

Moreover, it has been seen that robotics has some drawbacks as it deprived people from human feelings, but has played a vital role in professional relationships. People looking for jobs abroad has got the facility to communicate easily with the interference of automation. Outing plans can be fixed within a day without waiting for a long. Also, it has benefited our soldier working for nation, as they can interact with their family member any time they want without missing them. Though the negatives are there but has been overlooked by the positives. For example, in recent survey done by times of India states that 60% of professional’s feels that application like linkdin has kept people close knitted and they do not have to pay huge for getting updates related to the jobs and they can maintain their professional relations on good note.

To conclude, I would rather say, that technology has improved the thought process to take relationship seriously by talking and getting mingled with the person of your choice. It do not makes people dumb to take decision.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-10 Surbhithegirl 61 view
2021-10-27 tranvanngoc 61 view
2021-09-13 jacknn 73 view
2021-08-11 pourya 61 view
2021-06-24 urvi eva 73 view
Essays by user urvi eva :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...a person living abroad is not far, they seems with us the right moment. Therefore, te...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...gled with the person of your choice. It do not makes people dumb to take decision....
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
...th the person of your choice. It do not makes people dumb to take decision.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03504043127 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68217501584 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563342318059 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8003585002 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218153007032 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076264948707 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460909136984 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143584407335 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378690713257 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.