Without a doubt on the list of delightful activities, watching movies and reading books win the first rows. Some of the films are derived their stories from books and novels. In this regard, people have different approaches: either first reading the original book, or first watching the film. Although some people may think it is a great idea to watch the movie before reading the book, it is my firm conviction that it is better to read the original book first. There are quite a few reasons why I think this way, which I will explore in what follows.
To begin with, books and novels contain more details about the whole story. It is crystal clear that a book including hundreds of pages, can give us more information about the story; however, a movie that lasts only about three hours is a compact version of the original book. Additionally, by reading the book before the film, we can increase our imagination, and we can put ourselves in the shoes of the characters. As a result, not only can we have a better understanding of the story, but we can also be more enthusiastic to continue to read. On top of that, by this approach watching the film will be, to a great extent, a more amusing experience. For instance, When I was eleven years old, I used to read Harry Potter books, and I remember that I always used to imagine the scenes that Harry was fighting with Voldemort; it was so fascinating for me to read all about it. By the time I finished the book, I watched the movie, and it was really enjoyable to see the scenes which I had imagined before.
Secondly, if people watch the movie first, it is of high probability that they will not take the chance to read the original book. Reading a book is a demanding and time-consuming task. Consequently, a considerable amount of people try to avoid it, if it is not necessary. In addition, watching the film prior to reading the book, provides audiences the opportunity to both have the whole story in their mind, and more importantly, know the end of it. Therefore, they will be, to a great extent, less eager to read the book. Besides, sometimes people will not like the movie because of its actresses or directors’ approach, so they will lose their interest about the book. My own experience is a convincing illustration of this. Last year, my friend suggested me to read Pride and Prejudice, but I found its movie after a while, as a result, I watched the movie, and gave up reading the rest of the book due to the fact that I knew finally what was going to happen.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that watching the movie after reading the book is a more efficient way. This is because we can have access to more specific information, and enhance our imagination. Moreover, by choosing the counter strategy, we may not be as curious as before to engage in reading the book.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s and reading books win the first rows. Some of the films are derived their stories from bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'read'.
Suggestion: read
...ll be, to a great extent, less eager to read the book. Besides, sometimes people wil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on top of that, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55859375 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62910939037 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466796875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8674234785 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.47826087 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2608695652 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6086956522 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415111329094 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142108901088 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103554570683 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29438700118 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817188199272 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.