Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
There are many types of developing a movie, during the history of movies and films, directors and writers used different ideas in order to shape the body of their films, some of them are based on stories, some rests on books and some are just originate from the writers’ mind. The idea of creating a movie based on books came from the fact which is about running out of ideas for developing a film, by this way directors can attract lots of viewers for their films. In this way, some people are staunch adhere of reading the book which film is based on, before watching that movie, on the other hand, some enjoy watching movie before reading the book, I myself prefer to read books before watching movies, for two major reasons, and I try to explore the rationale behind my statement in the ensuing paragraphs.
Let’s start with consideration of the fact that is about the power of imagination, I myself love to conceive the whole story before watching the film, as books are always full of details about scenes and characters, to provoke our thoughts. By this way they can make the story more tangible and concrete. By the time I am reading the books, I try to imagine all things about their scenes, characters’ face, their customs and their behaviors and so on, in order to check my imaginations and guesses during watching the movie. Actually, I did this before watching “The lord of the rings” movie and I enjoyed it a lot.
Another significant proof which deserves attention is details that are exist in books and may be omitted in the movies because of different reasons, such as the duration of the films, their budgets and things like that, as I said before, I love to imagine the whole story and this cannot be achieved just by watching a short film, a vivid example that can be given in order to shed the light on what was explored is the movie of “Hobbit”. They had deleted different parts of the story, in order to make it short and brief, actually after all, the film duration was about 3 hours, but if they wanted to make it completely the same as the story, it would be about 10 hours.
To sum up, as I said before, reading a book that a film is based on it is an excellent idea as it will help to imagine different parts of the movie and also we can know about the whole story within details. So I suggest to read before watch in order to enjoy more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y statement in the ensuing paragraphs. Let's start with consideration of t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs' movie and I enjoyed it a lot. Another significant proof which deserves...
^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... deserves attention is details that are exist in books and may be omitted in the movi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the story, it would be about 10 hours. To sum up, as I said before, reading a b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest reading'.
Suggestion: suggest reading
...ut the whole story within details. So I suggest to read before watch in order to enjoy more.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, after all, as for, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50800915332 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49080857784 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450800915332 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.1344086022 194% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.254139057 48.9658058833 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.090909091 100.406767564 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.7272727273 20.6045352989 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386846803774 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148885183137 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132884241038 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236163813486 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128853355572 0.0645574589148 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 11.7677419355 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.0537634409 175% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.