Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about endotherm animals. The writer of the reading believes that dinosaurs are endotherm and provide three explanations to support the idea. The lecturer, on the other hand, is not convinced that the explanations made by the author proved dinosaurs are endotherms.
First, the author of the reading asserts that only endotherms could live in cold climates and polar regions. Because of the discovery of dinosaurs in the polars, they should be considered endotherms. In contrast, the lecturer disagrees with the argument made by the author. He posits that polar regions are warmer in part of the year. The reason that dinosaurs migrated to warmer places was to reproduce, he says.
Second, it is claimed in the reading that dinosaurs must be categorized as endotherms because they have legs beneath their bodies. Reptiles and many lizards’ legs are placed on the body side. In contrast, the lecturer disputes this claim either. He notes that being legs under the body does not bring about the results the author claims. He notes that legs beneath the dinosaur’s bodies have other advantages as running.
Third, the writer outlines that dinosaurs’ bone structure has Haversian canals. The characteristic leads animals to grow rapidly and it is considered an endotherms ability. The lecturer disputes these outlines too. He explains that based on the growth ring in bone structure in dinosaurs’ bones showing stop grow in cold weather. He notes that endotherms have persistent growth in bones, a feature not observed in dinosaurs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...three explanations to support the idea. The lecturer, on the other hand, is not con...
^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'endotherms'' or 'endotherm's'?
Suggestion: endotherms'; endotherm's
...to grow rapidly and it is considered an endotherms ability. The lecturer disputes these ou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, third, as to, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2371541502 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70507665973 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517786561265 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6341126524 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6111111111 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0555555556 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122958343014 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424704532439 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444812000548 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080332917258 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339907201648 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.