Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about communal online encyclopedias which is about the collection of objects on various subjects. The writer of the reading suggests three explanations that make online encyclopedias less valuable than the printed one. On the other hand, none of the explanations provided by the writer seem convincing to the lecturer.
To begin with, the author outlines that contributors in online encyclopedias provide more inaccurate and flawed information than traditional ones. This is because they don’t have enough academic credentials. By contrast, the lecturer notes that the outline does not bring about the results the author made. She posits that traditional encyclopedias are not accurate, either. Furthermore, she mentions that it is easier to correct mistakes in the online version, however, in the traditional version the mistakes remain for decades.
Second, according to the reading, the author claims that the nature of the encyclopedias provides hackers to alter information in them. This claim was challenged by the lecturer, either. she points out that one strategy is allowing people and contributors to change based on a format making sure articles are reliable. The second strategy she explains is devoting special editors to monitoring changes to eliminate changes they believe decisive.
Finally, it is claimed in the reading that communal topics are so popular and less important creating a deceiving impression of what important is. In contrast, this claim was debunked by the lecturer. She notes that there is little space in the traditional version to depict a variety of interests people have in articles. In the online version, however, not only the academic articles presented, there are a variety of articles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...was challenged by the lecturer, either. she points out that one strategy is allowin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, second, so, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44727272727 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89759090588 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5516742317 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978394578861 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284191559908 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388588716016 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532416836007 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240569059716 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.