Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage.
Online encyclopedias are one of the newest sources to the internet, the author starts with mentioning the drawbacks of online encyclopedias however the speaker disagrees with him by mentioning possible solutions.
The Author insists that such open resources that can be edited by anyone are inaccurate and lack academic credentials however the speaker thinks that it is not a huge deal since traditional encyclopedias are also inaccurate in many cases while also stating that in traditional encyclopedias errors might stay for decades but in online encyclopedias they can be edited easily.
Another reason pointed out by the speaker is the hacking/fabrication that might happen saying that a portion of information is protected by the read only format as well as mentioning that edits to these online encyclopedias are being monitored by special editors solving the fabrication doubts that the author have.
A unique feature that online encyclopedias have is unlimited space and providing space for everything without leaving anything out or focusing on thing on the other side traditional encyclopedias can't do that due to limited space and having limited space may lead to a false impressions on the subject.
To sum up, the speaker deny with the Author and shows that both of them have different point of views about online encyclopedias.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Online encyclopedias are one of the newe...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...him by mentioning possible solutions The Author insists that such open resour...
^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... resources that can be edited by anyone are inaccurate and lack academic credential...
^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for decades but in online encyclopedias they can be edited easily Another ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clopedias they can be edited easily Another reason pointed out by the speake...
^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that edits to these online encyclopedias are being monitored by special editors s...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rication doubts that the author have A unique feature that online encyclopedi...
^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...he other side traditional encyclopedias cant do that due to limited space and having...
^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'impression'?
Suggestion: impression
...aving limited space may lead to a false impressions on the subject To sum up the spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o a false impressions on the subject To sum up the speaker deny with the Auth...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, as well as, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31924882629 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04990199513 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558685446009 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 213.0 21.2450331126 1003% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1133.0 110.228320801 1028% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 213.0 21.698381199 982% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 82.0 7.06452816374 1161% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0632726708699 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632726708699 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408359336405 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367058134732 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 110.1 13.3589403974 824% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -153.18 53.8541721854 -284% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 87.5 11.0289183223 793% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.06 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.46 8.42419426049 207% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 10.7273730684 578% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 87.2 10.498013245 831% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 88.0 11.2008830022 786% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.