TPO53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Nowadays, as technology advances, people spend more time online. Therefore, the government is considering whether to pay attention to online or public transport, which it did not think about before. I think the government should invest more money in the online information network. I will tell you two reasons to support my opinion.
First, rapid information exchange develops the economy. These days, exchanging information is the most important thing. People now interact online and exchange information rather than directly communicating. For example, in most developed countries, online is very advanced, so information exchange takes quickly. This means the rapid information exchange helps the country's development. Also many people make money, study and find data through this. That is why investing money online is more economically efficient.
Second, the development of the Internet makes people equal. People who live in rural or remote areas often have difficulty accessing. Then, if these people do not know the news and do not know the information properly in the rapidly changing modern society, human alienation will occur. This is not because the Internet is too advanced, but because it is not yet fully developed and has not become widespread.
This is why I think the Internet is more important than public transportation. Of course, both ways have pros and cons, so the government should think more about what is the best way to develop the country.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...xchange helps the countrys development. Also many people make money, study and find ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the best way to develop the country.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 52.1666666667 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 232.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40517241379 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83535518078 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9900790978 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7647058824 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6470588235 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153270427738 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533675557699 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470168140411 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102158248844 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527890225765 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...xchange helps the countrys development. Also many people make money, study and find ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the best way to develop the country.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 52.1666666667 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 232.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40517241379 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83535518078 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9900790978 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7647058824 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6470588235 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153270427738 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533675557699 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470168140411 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102158248844 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527890225765 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.