Some people claim that public museum and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and work of art by using a computer. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Have many people believed that public museum and art galleries will be no longer necessary since all historical objects and work of art can be viewed online. In my opinion, I balance with this above argument and this essay will examine both sides.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of public museum and art galleries I’d unnecessary, have technologies devices for this. First, museum and art galleries of famous painters believed that spread art and especially for art lovers regardless of their background. This art support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall popularity of art of lower income people but also to excellent art of painters in museum is their trying, the reason for have museum and art galleries is have good experience more enjoying and emotions, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, art is show in museum would probably result in a greater supply of talent painters, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that archiving history with work of art and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
However, historical museums and art galleries are believed to be supplanted by the recent technological revolution. First, by using technological devices such as mobile phones and tablets, people, especially elders, are now able to keep in touch with their family members regardless of geographical distance. Don’t stop there, whenever always equipped with a techno devices used to access Internet, so museums is not exception and everyone can watching the piece of art. Second,some painters nowadays will have an online art galleries on social pages or online visitor at home. Google art and Culture, for example, have become an Internet platform where users are able to instantly reach International art and even professional connections, which promotes better social behavior and strengthen social connections.
I was discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, each other nowadays can choose different types for enjoying art and historical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think it is advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of households owning four types of electronic devices between 1995 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The bar chart show the number of visit to community website in first year and second years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features have relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...on for have museum and art galleries is have good experience more enjoying and emoti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'watch'
Suggestion: watch
...seums is not exception and everyone can watching the piece of art. Second,some painters ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
...ne can watching the piece of art. Second,some painters nowadays will have an online a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, for example, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38972809668 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87991956677 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583081570997 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8815030868 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375161674808 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135931132025 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10850800779 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243866234398 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143447584483 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.