The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heati

A memo to the board of directors of a company that delivers heating oil says that northeastern United States will have an experience of increased demand of heating oil in next five years relying on the evidence that recent year, the region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures in last heating season and more homes are being built with the population growth. To make the prediction presented in the argument reasonable, the company must answer three questions.
Firstly, the memo presented the data of increased demand in last year in that region. Will the demand continue in the next years? Is not possible that the weather will change in next years? Perhaps, the weather might get changed and the people of that region will use less fuel in future. For instance, the temperature of any region varies in year to year and no one can predict surely about the future year exact weather condition using only one year weather data. So, to justify the claim, the company should provide more research data.
Secondly, will the people always rely on oil use rather than other sources of power? Will people not look for other sources for heating? Perhaps people will use gasolines for heating rather than oil and it is also known that the cost of environment for the use of use of gasolines is less in amount comparative to use of oil. So, it might be possible that people will get more dependent on gasolines rather than oil in upcoming future. So, to justify the claim that people will depend on oil only in future, the company should provide more reliable data.
Finally, does building up new homes mean increase of more oil consumption in northeastern United States permanently? Perhaps, it might not be true. It might be possible that people of other regions are building up homes in this region of the country. They are possibly building new homes for travelling purpose or business purpose. So, to ensure that building up new homes refers to more oil consumption in future five years, the memo should have had more specific data.
In conclusion, it can be said that to evaluate the prediction showed in the argument, the memo should be enriched with some answers of the questions narrated above, then the prediction will be ready for next evaluation that the region will need more oil delivery in future five years.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A memo to the board of directors of a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e company must answer three questions. Firstly, the memo presented the data of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...eople of that region will use less fuel in future. For instance, the temperature of any r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any should provide more research data. Secondly, will the people always rely on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'use of'.
Suggestion: use of
...wn that the cost of environment for the use of use of gasolines is less in amount comparative...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...aim that people will depend on oil only in future, the company should provide more reliab...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any should provide more reliable data. Finally, does building up new homes mean...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mo should have had more specific data. In conclusion, it can be said that to ev...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8325 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45404640339 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4225 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3006110653 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.736842105 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225146235594 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731540776388 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672783519249 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134895172754 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689353174125 0.0667264976115 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A memo to the board of directors of a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e company must answer three questions. Firstly, the memo presented the data of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...eople of that region will use less fuel in future. For instance, the temperature of any r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any should provide more research data. Secondly, will the people always rely on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'use of'.
Suggestion: use of
...wn that the cost of environment for the use of use of gasolines is less in amount comparative...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...aim that people will depend on oil only in future, the company should provide more reliab...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any should provide more reliable data. Finally, does building up new homes mean...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mo should have had more specific data. In conclusion, it can be said that to ev...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8325 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45404640339 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4225 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3006110653 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.736842105 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225146235594 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731540776388 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672783519249 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134895172754 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689353174125 0.0667264976115 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.