Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Workers should feel comfortable doing their job. Having many different tasks to do in a day might bring confusion and misinformation to an operator. Moreover, said worker would have to learn and master all the tasks they are expected to do, which adds to the complexity of the job and makes the learning curve for new recruits steeper. It might be better do have similar tasks throughout the day and focus on perfecting these tasks rather than jumping between unique assignments that share nothing with each other.
Naturally, mixing tasks will create confusion for anyone doing them. It is much easier to control the quality of one's work when it consists of similar tasks. Level of quality will undoubtedly deteriorate as more assignments are mixed together and piled up on a single person's shoulders. In order to combat this confusion, more time and energy will have to be spent on both quality control and education of new workers to ensure desirable outcomes.
It is understandable for employers to desire the best outcome from their employees. For workers to achieve this goal, they have to be skillful in the job trusted to them. The most natural way of getting skillful, is by accumulating experience doing the job over time. So, it can be understood that entrusting routine works to workers will make them more efficient the more they spend doing their daily works. On the other hand, if workers had to tend to many different tasks in a day, it will take much more time for them to get proficient and perfect on the job as the learning curve in initial steps will be more complex.
In conclusion, I believe it is better for workers to have similar tasks in a day rather than working on multiple types of tasks. Not only does it prevent unwanted confusion that happens from switching tasks, it also is easier to reach higher levels of skill and comfort in set number of days.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-30 HSNDEK 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user reza77 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eel comfortable doing their job. Having many different tasks to do in a day might bring confus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
... tasks will create confusion for anyone doing them. It is much easier to control the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e other hand, if workers had to tend to many different tasks in a day, it will take much more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...erfect on the job as the learning curve in initial steps will be more complex. In...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5341510364 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542682926829 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6942775461 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.866666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307180135508 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109375140789 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719408940952 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185709587699 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913252568175 0.0645574589148 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.