Collectors prize the ancient life- size clay statuesof human figuresmade on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archeologist have recently discoveredmolds of human heads a

Essay topics:

Collectors prize the ancient life- size clay statuesof human figuresmade on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archeologist have recently discoveredmolds of human heads and hands on Kali, we can now conclude that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. This discovery explains why few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. In light of this discovery, collectors predict that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in the value.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions need to be answered in oredr to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how th eanswers to these questions would help to evaluate the [rediction.

Author makes the case for collectors' prediction that the value of the miniatures would increase while that of life size sculptures would decrease. In doing so, he employs certain premises like finding of molds of those Kalinese life size sculptures indicating that they might have been made from molds rather then carved by tools and techniques. Other reasons being the abstract nature and distinct style of the miniature which suggest that miniatures were not made from molds but carved by tools. The argument of author looks plausible but a deeper scrutiny reveals varous loopholes which must be filled in order to bolster the argument and give it more credibility.

First, the collectors cannot be justified to determine the value of the art forms without knowing the likes and dislikes of the people. A survey must be produced to show that the people actually give more importance to the way the art is made. It is quite possible that people actually don't care whether the art is made from molds or sculpting tools. They might only be concernes with the aesthetics of the art and the beauty that it bring with it. To negate this, the author must bring forth concrete statistics of people choice with expedient questions in a normed survey which is representative of the people interested in the art. This result will giove a better indication of whether truly the value of these arts would change or not after the discovery of molds.

Secondly, a case might be made that since miniatures were abstract and distinct in nature, they might not be able to replace the purpose the life size sculptures might interest specific people. For example, they are people who donot understand and like abstract art and their specific liking is for life size sculptures only. The miniatures would not at all be of interest to those specific people and hence, the value of miniatures would not be affected at all, even tough the value of life sculpture might decrease after the revealing of the fact that molds they were made by molds.

It is also very much possible that people donot follow and are not aware of the archeological findings at all. Therefore, they would not come to know about the mold things and hence, there would be no affect to the pricings of the art types at all. It is very important to find out how well abreast of archeologies and art are the people who buy these things in order to predict if yes, it would affect the value and to what extent it would.

Also, the author also needs to let us know, how many of the life size sculptures and miniatures are present totally. It is because of the fact that valuer is determined by availability of the product,a lower availability of life size sculptures might not let the value decrease though it might be made of mold.

Thereforre, the author must answer these questions and the evidences called above to make his agreement strong and creditable.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... might have been made from molds rather then carved by tools and techniques. Other r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... is quite possible that people actually dont care whether the art is made from molds...
^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...d miniatures are present totally. It is because of the fact that valuer is determined by availability of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...etermined by availability of the product,a lower availability of life size sculptu...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247689463956 0.25644967241 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.153419593346 0.15541462614 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0665434380776 0.0836205057962 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536044362292 0.0520304965353 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0369685767098 0.0272364105082 136% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.138632162662 0.125424944231 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0406654343808 0.0416121511921 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46542685463 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258780036969 0.026700313972 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00184842883549 0.001811407834 102% => OK
Determiners: 0.116451016636 0.113004496875 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0425138632163 0.0255425247493 166% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147874306839 0.0127820249294 116% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2918.0 2731.13054187 107% => OK
No of words: 505.0 446.07635468 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77821782178 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.57801047555 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.30099009901 0.378187486979 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.20198019802 0.287650121315 70% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162376237624 0.208842608468 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10297029703 0.135150697306 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46542685463 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 207.018472906 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439603960396 0.469332199767 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.1899786689 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5789473684 23.2022227129 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.971850346 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.578947368 141.986410481 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5789473684 23.2022227129 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.724660767414 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 46.7769671704 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.75 1.8405768891 95% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177428182177 0.441005458295 40% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.16535270976 0.135418324435 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.071280196287 0.0829849096947 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.654099197733 0.58762219726 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142052858338 0.147661913831 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871214391008 0.193483328276 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317855529414 0.0970749176394 33% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.394439673435 0.42659136922 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.121102283794 0.0774707102158 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119044544273 0.312017818177 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353216686366 0.0698173142475 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 6.46551724138 170% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.