If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain the resoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your positon.
"Practise makes a man perfect", rightly goes the famous dictum. While no doubt that an experienced candidate would be more favourable for a job position for two otherwise equally qualified applicants, I do not surmise that this would be applicable to all the circumstances ubiquitously and even-handedly. The eligibility of job may increase with the experience of the employee, but there are also cases where experience may not affect the suitability of the employee for that job and it may go as far as to that experience hurts the eligibility of the candidate negetively.
Firstly, the commonplace situations where the more the experience is, the better are the job prospects. In most of the jobs, experience is the most invaluable asset. The insights and learning gained during experience cannot be replaced by any academic or theorotical knowledge. For example, the job of maintenance of machines in a manufacturing plant like Tesla. No matter how scholarly you are, the true skills are harbored and developed with the experience of dealing with the breakdowns. Those insights form nueral connection in brains that gives a kind of intuition adn gumption of hacking the root cause of te problems. The only way it is developed is with experience. Therefore, if the company has an option between two similarly read people for a job vacancy, a more experienced person would be selected.
Coming to the situations wherein the job appropriateness is in no way affected by the experience. There are jobs whose requirements are skill which donot vary with practise or experience or time. They are kind of binary function. In the way that, either the person knows it or doesnot knows it. For example, operating a specific kind of machine. If the person knows how to do that, no matter if he or she is experienced or not, he would be able to do his/her job satisfactorily. In such circumstances, instead of opting for a candidate with better experience, other skills should be taken into consideration like, how honest the person is or how hard working he seems, his determination, his soft skills etc. These criteria would help in choosing a better employ for these kinds of jobs that are not a function of experience.
Lastly, there are some jobs wherein the experience can hurt. Generally these are the creative jobs which need a fresh outlook and out of the box thinking. For instance, an interior decorator or a painter. In such cases, we need innovative ideas which can be hampered by experience that makes the thinking very conventional and defined. These situations call for people with minimal experience but very creative mind, ingenious thinking and undefined vision. So, the more expedient choice for these cases would be an individual with less experience.
Summing up, although experience plays a cardinal role in suitability for majority of the jobs present in the market, making this rule of - more is the experience, better is the candidate- universally true to all situation is not right. There are jobs wherein experience may not count or may even be baneful to the job.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'lastly', 'look', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234375 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.133680555556 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0885416666667 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0590277777778 0.0497285424764 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243055555556 0.0444667217837 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116319444444 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.03125 0.0406280797675 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.02224760444 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0121527777778 0.030933414821 39% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00173611111111 0.0016655270985 104% => OK
Determiners: 0.131944444444 0.0997080785238 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0260416666667 0.0249443105267 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0225694444444 0.0148568991511 152% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3102.0 2732.02544248 114% => OK
No of words: 515.0 452.878318584 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02330097087 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339805825243 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267961165049 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223300970874 0.200843997647 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159223300971 0.132149295362 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02224760444 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479611650485 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 56.1272956331 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0740740741 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4252755133 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0740740741 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.62962962963 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 45.8701905789 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.76 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556297063567 0.391690518653 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0807974527096 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.079070758359 0.077325440228 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.472640924503 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155802334745 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198649201898 0.161403998019 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114404976525 0.0892212321368 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422286318206 0.385218514788 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113138810106 0.0692045440612 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394103105153 0.275328986314 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063594684364 0.0653680567796 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.