If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The job market in any country always prefers the person with more experience but I think the person with less experience should be given chance also. So, I am standing against the prompt here. There are certain other qualities to distinguish between two applicants. In my opinion, two applicants can not be totally equally qualified or equal in all respect other than experience.
If the employer always looks for the applicant with more experience then the applicant with less experience or the fresher will never get a chance to showcase their skill set. Though it is completely dependent upon the employers that which type of employee he wants. There is a matter of profit from any job so the employers try to hire the most experienced ones. But, if the inexperienced ones are never given a chance to be experienced then it will be a severe injustice to them.
Here, it is mentioned that the applicants are equally qualified. They may be equally qualified but as a person they can't be same. They must have distinguishable features such as honesty, punctuality etc. The employers should anyhow check those qualities to select the better one. The 'experience' should not be the only measure for the eligible one, I guess. Because, for a successful business in any job the employers must be honest, hardworking, punctual, skilled etc. So, if the less experienced one is more honest, hardworking and punctual than the more experienced one; the less experienced one must be offered the job without any doubt.
Apart from personal traits there are also other things to look for in an employee such as communication skill, leadership quality, creativity etc. If these traits are present in the less experienced one but absent in the more experienced one then, definitely the less experienced one is more eligible for the job, I think. There is always a chance to fire the employee who is not doing justice to the place he is given. That is why I think, the less experienced one should be given chance and if they fail to fulfill the demands then employers can fire him. But, if they are never offered a chance then they will always be inexperienced.
We must keep in mind that the most experienced applicant was once 'inexperienced'. He was given an opportunity to be experienced by someone. So, we can never do injustice to a skilled applicant just because he has less experience. We have to measure them in all respects. Only experience can't be an issue. Their academic records as well as the other traits mentioned above should be the benchmark for an eligible applicant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... less experience should be given chance also. So, I am standing against the prompt h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... for the applicant with more experience then the applicant with less experience or t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t a chance to showcase their skill set. Though it is completely dependent upon the emp...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... equally qualified but as a person they cant be same. They must have distinguishable...
^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for a successful business in any job the employers must be honest, hardworking, p...
^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
...ny doubt. Apart from personal traits there are also other things to look for in an employee such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e them in all respects. Only experience cant be an issue. Their academic records as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, well, apart from, i guess, i think, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86136363636 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80321446979 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431818181818 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4884379727 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2692307692 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170141447572 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052332306136 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541876424151 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116574593062 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438789967567 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.