If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
As many companies recruiting new employees, they may tend to hire the one with more experience if two candidates are equally qualified since they expects people who have more experience to bear more skills and thus to be more helpful. However, I do not totally agree with the prompt statement.
First of all, the most important factor I consider is that sometimes innovation and different approaches to address problems are needed, and candidate who has less experience is less likely to be constrained by his or her previous successful examples. For instance, in the field of marketing and advertising, thinking out of box and new ideas are highly valuable. While employee who has a lot of experience may deal with a task decently, a person who does not have many experience - maybe he or she is younger or has working experience on other fields - may come up with more creative ideas by catching the trend of young generations or well applying knowledge of other fields on the task. Therefore, it is not necessarily that people with less experience cannot perform better.
However, it cannot be denied that for some jobs, people who have more experience will perform better for sure. Take hardware or software system administration as an example. As many reasons of bugs sometimes do not really make sense under any mathematical, physical or other theoretical reasoning, addressing these problems cannot be mastered from methods other then accumulating abundant of experience. In this case, a veteran will definitely performs better than a tyro, though two may have same education degrees or both have gone through same trainings.
To sum up, given the points discussed above, we may safely come to the conclusion that sometimes company should also consider bringing new blood to the office by hiring people who have less experience while well qualified for the occupation. Maybe they will inspire and incite the whole office to think in different ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'expect'
Suggestion: expect
...idates are equally qualified since they expects people who have more experience to bear...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much experience', 'a good deal of experience'.
Suggestion: much experience; a good deal of experience
...sk decently, a person who does not have many experience - maybe he or she is younger or has wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: OTHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'other than'?
Suggestion: other than
...roblems cannot be mastered from methods other then accumulating abundant of experience. In...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...s cannot be mastered from methods other then accumulating abundant of experience. In...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09627329193 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76817785591 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.1056763518 60.3974514979 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.21951772744 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120377491638 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495509621043 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426712234397 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815179514292 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375829036388 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.