The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There is no time in history that machines and technologies has changed and improved more dramatically than the past several decades. As these machines are used as tools by human, some people claim that human mind will always be superior to machines. As far as I am concerned, I think these people are probably overly confident on this matter.
People who are in favor of this prompt statement may argue that since it is human who develops these tools and makes them come into being, we would always have full control on them. Admittedly, if machines such as cars, mobile phones or televisions break down, scientists, engineers or technicians can always find ways to fix them. In this case, it is true that human minds are superior to machines. However, if human maintains these machine and let them work well, they do a lot of things they human minds may not be able to.
Primarily, machines, not like human, can work continuously without taking any rest. Alpha Go, the machine learning program developed by Google, can be a good showcase to illustrate this. Since Alpha Go does not need to rest, it can play go with itself and learn from these games days and nights. Thus, the program is improving much rapidly than human beings. As latest news reported, so far, Alpha Go already beat many top human Go players and developed a special and fresh strategy that human players have never imagined.
In addition, people may lose some critical abilities if they unduly rely on machines. Nowadays, many people are too used to rely on technologies to solve problems. When it comes to calculations, many people only know how to use calculators but not counting in their minds. When people need to look for a place, they may mostly open Google Maps on their smart phone but not train their orientation skills. Therefore, people are gradually losing these crucial skills due to out of training.
In conclusion, although it is human who creates machines, machines are superior to human minds in some aspects. Not only because they can work endlessly and keep improving, but also sometimes human are too lazy and thus get rusty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...ny rest. Alpha Go, the machine learning program developed by Google, can be a good show...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83287671233 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46774044748 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0967572304 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8421052632 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212591417788 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720324597824 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073683178867 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132987870531 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638516690158 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.