The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d

Machines are always invented to help the human or to reduce the work load of human. in this 21st century many manual tasks which were carried by the humans are now being complete by the machines. Here Human intelligence is compared with the machine brains. And conclusion is drawn that the human brains are always superior to to the computers. Because, at the end machine or computers are the invention by the human being. I believe that the humans are having the more points in the race of machines and human brain. Bellow given examples support this point.

Firstly, When we talk about the work efficiency we can easily tell that computers are faster and accurate for some minor computing tasks but when we talk about taking big decision that will affect the results in longer period of time, Humans are always ahead and more sharp in the analytical and critical thinking. Nowadays computers are getting programmed in a way that they can take some minor decisions but at the end of the day they can only gather and analyse the data they can not give the future idea or future plan. For example a big retail market manager has to take the big decisions in their day to day life. Such as create or modify the policies or make a rule for the company in order to get the advantages in future. In this case computers can only give the summary of the data of they can only analyse the data. But, they do not have the ability to make decisions which will result as a profit to company.

Secondly, in the new era of digitlization most of the shopping or other day to day activities are reforming and taking shape of websites. And they are useful also to save out time and quicken the process of shopping. But the computers or machines will always lack the creativity that the human mind have. Humans are having creativity which can reflect in the society as art or in terms of the tools to entertain the humans but computers will not have that ability. We can consider the case of Ice-Cream seller in the mall, He will sell the ice-cream to the customer and make fun with them. By doing this customer will also feel good and mood will also get enlighten. But computers which are programmed, They did not have ability to do creative things

In a nutshell, We can say that the computers can be helpful in terms of the data collection or computation tasks but they never can be more powerful than the human brain. because the inability of thinking creatively of lacking the ability to make quick decisions in the crucial time

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...an or to reduce the work load of human. in this 21st century many manual tasks whi...
^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...at the human brains are always superior to to the computers. Because, at the end mach...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... that will affect the results in longer period of time, Humans are always ahead and more sharp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... company in order to get the advantages in future. In this case computers can only give t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... be more powerful than the human brain. because the inability of thinking creatively of...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... be more powerful than the human brain. because the inability of thinking creatively of...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55164835165 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33250294308 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446153846154 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6737495244 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.619047619 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21819262341 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826955749575 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067452709349 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14403887414 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804419132836 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.