The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As its creator Alan Turing stated machine think differently than human do. the question is whether we consider it, the computer, to think because it thinks fundamentally different than how human do? The prompted stated than human will be always superier than machines or computer because human own the machine as only a tool. In my opinion, I disagree with the prompt by taking in consideration of the two crucial aspect of capability: Mental and Physical.
Mentally, machines have the potential to surpass the cognitive ability of humanity, thus having potential beyond human. For stances, Computation machine like Turing machine or classic computer is far superior at mathematically computation than human. Traditional computer is capable arithmetic, adding and subtracting, calculation billions of time, outmatching human's potential by thousands of times. This mathematical ability is basis of human's logic and cognitive ability. With future development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the machine can be began making its own "cognitive ability" without human's succor; ability such objects detection, pattern cognition and optimization are already surpassing human's ability today. With AI's other cognitive ability predicted surpass human in the near further, This is the reason that there such fear of machine taking over humanity.
Physically, machine are capable of perform task indefinitely. Machine in the automotive industry, such as, worked around the clock for decades without fatigue. a typical daily maintainance requirement is about 1 hour, between the shifts, compared required eight to ten hours of sleep per day of human. Physically machine also outperforms human in terms of strength. A typical force exerted by a stamping machine are in scale of meganewton compared to a human's force in scale of hundreds of newtons.
Human are currently the most intelligent and capable living creature in the world and machine can be considered mirely a creation of humanity as a tool. However, similarly to our relationship to machine, human are also creations of less developed species. If humans are able to out smart our creator, so are machine are capable to be superior than us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...cause it thinks fundamentally different than how human do? The prompted stated than ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... the clock for decades without fatigue. a typical daily maintainance requirement ...
^
Line 13, column 344, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
... are machine are capable to be superior than us.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, thus, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51470588235 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98143622064 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3695201798 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285267721404 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101932034732 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603155081611 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181257844233 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276840529421 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.