Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
When it comes to the complex problem that how to produce a moral society, some people claim that we should adopt morality lessons as the foundation of education, while others may claim that logical reasoning is more important for people to behave morally. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the first argument more for the following reasons.
First of all, every logical reasoning that will lead to decent manner and correct decision is actually based on morality. Logical reasoning will have no use for a person who does not know what is right and what is wrong. Since if that person think killing people is a moral manner, he or she will feel no guilty and be as comfortable as any saint. Thus, it is critical that our education let people be fully aware of and truly understand the correct moral values.
Admittedly, logical reasoning is important for people to make correct judgment because sometimes moral issues are complicated. Take the story of Miserable World as an example. The main character was put in to jail for several years simply because he stole a bread for his starved nephew. In this case, although it cannot be denied that the leading character broke the law, yet the judge should apply his logical thinking skill and perceive the deep moral essence. Had the judge had accepted good logical reasoning education, he would have seen that the main character is actually very kind and would not give him such a heavy punishment. Although here logical reasoning is of great importance, we should not ignore that the judge still need the correct morality knowledge to come to this conclusion.
To sum up, despite I concede that logical reasoning is very crucial in understanding the true moral essence, morality is still the most foundational basis. Thus, education should take morality as its basic curriculum and also educate students reasoning skills to let them be able to extend the morality they learned to suit other circumstances they may face in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'bread'.
Suggestion: bread
...r several years simply because he stole a bread for his starved nephew. In this case, a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, may, so, still, thus, while, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88495575221 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52616247584 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551622418879 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4248510559 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276582906167 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915652922445 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741843807793 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179341618076 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632595891705 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.