If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The prompt suggests that if two equally qualified people are applying for a specific job, the company should hire the one with more experience. I agree with this claim as with experience, comes good decision making skills and more efficiency.
First of all, it is almost always advantageous to hire a person with experience over an inexperienced one as that person knows what he is doing and this reduces the chances of making mistakes that often a novice would make. Would you trust the control of a multi-million dollar company over an inexperienced person or would you rather prefer someone with some years of experience in the field be in charge? A person with experience knows what he is trying to do due to their astute decision making skills. For instance, we often see small start-ups fail due to problems in their management. These problems often start as small, petty problems but later exacerbates due to wrong decisions taken by an often inexperienced group of people. On the contrary, consider the example of Sundar Pichai -- Google's CEO. He had a plethora of experience in field before he took over the helm as Google's CEO.
Secondly, with years of experience comes trust. An experienced person is well versed with the requirements of his job and how to perform his tasks in a professional manner. Just having a specific qualification doesn't mean that the person know's how to apply his skills in a proper and efficient manner. It is with experience that a person learns how to actually work in an efficient manner and be productive to his organization. For example, consider a case where we have a fresh college Graduate with a Computer Science degree and a professional in the field of Computer science who has five years of experience. Even though both have the same qualifications on paper, it is the latter who knows how to actually work in the industry. The former would have to be taught about the nitty-gritties of the job before he can understand his work properly and start contributing to his organization.
Admittedly, it can be agreed that sometimes fresh faces can come up with brilliant ideas, for example, Steve Jobs, who had no prior experience in coding came up with a revolutionary idea of Apple Inc. But, we shouldn't forget that experience always makes you wiser and thus helps you take the right decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hai -- Googles CEO. He had a plethora of experience in field before he took over ...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a professional manner" with adverb for "professional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of his job and how to perform his tasks in a professional manner. Just having a specific qualification d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r. Just having a specific qualification doesnt mean that the person knows how to apply...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at a person learns how to actually work in an efficient manner and be productive to his organization. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...evolutionary idea of Apple Inc. But, we shouldnt forget that experience always makes you...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.865 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83655723149 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6769723435 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179893222303 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627254388693 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652658547081 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1437034445 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088391087089 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.