TPO 12- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, the world alters rapidly and all human experience a huge improvement and advancement in the field of science and engineering. Likewise, this swift development causes the advent of new subjects which are all interconnected to each other. In fact, today, we face more of interdisciplinary studies. When it comes to specializing in academic subjects, controversy surrounds the issue of whether it is beneficial to have a broad knowledge of several academic subjects or not? I am of the opinion that people should enhance their knowledge in different subjects and the further explanation will elaborate on this matter.
One of the most significant aspects of the ongoing topic which demands a keen contemplation is that if people want to keep pace with the modern technology, they have to master in more than one specific subject. That is to say, as new developments use different science to operate, we have to enhance our perception to realize their usage better. Take my father for instance. He has been working in the IT company as a web developer in the past 10 years. A couple of months ago, their company adopted higher technology to acquire more customers and make more money. However, my dad did not wary of this change and he did not have the ability to perceive advanced and higher appliances. Consequently, he got fired from his work because they were searching for new adept employees whose knowledge were vast enough to adjust for different conditions.
Another noteworthy aspect of the topic which needs to be reflected is that companies today are looking for multifaceted people to perform faster. As a matter of fact, all companies and factories compete with each other and perfectly know that a business holder cannot reach to extreme interest rate unless dominates a broad range of information and data. Thus, a versatile employee can help them broaden their notions about different aspects of their work. Moreover, they can facilitate the time which has to be allocated for one work because they have enough knowledge to come up with creative solutions. To illustrate, perhaps my own experience can shed more light on this matter.
I am always a person who gets the job just because of my extensive knowledge in fields of mechanics and business. My boss relies on my tips to manage business related problems.
Paradoxically, it is impossible to get profound knowledge by mastering in different subjects because as an important saying indicates that every person is born a unique talent to be a profession in some subject. In this regard, nobody is able to be perfect in any scientific fields due to their characteristics.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am pretty convinced that there are many reasons for supporting the idea of mastering in more than one specific subject because we can keep pace with the new technology and also get better job positions. Meanwhile, it is improbable to get a deep understanding in all subjects because of our limited brain capacity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...er for instance. He has been working in the IT company as a web developer in the past ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...instance. He has been working in the IT company as a web developer in the past 10 years...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2522.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02390438247 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91167197417 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535856573705 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.513703349 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.652173913 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8260869565 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193025468851 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489753526554 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673694506562 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101902082823 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061522451274 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.