TPO 48
The reading passage claims that as the decline or extinction of many frog species have detrimental effects on humans, they should be protected from being extinct, and provides three methods to solve the problem. The lecturer, meanwhile, asserts that none of the recommended solutions are practical for frog population and then refutes each of the author's reasons.
To begin with, the reading statement declares that pesticides are the reason that harms the frogs and these chemicals attack the nervous system of the frogs resulting to severe breathing problems. Moreover, there should be some strict laws to prohibit the farmers of using these pesticides near frog population. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that reducing the pesticides is not economically practical for most of the farmers and if there is a law in this case, it will definitely have a negative impact on the farmers because of the low yield in comparison to other farmers.
Second, although the reading passage posits that the main reason that affect the decrease in frog population is a fungus with a deadly effect, the lecturer makes the argument that this claim should be studied individually to each frog and scientists have to capture all new generations to make this investigation convincing, so this would be pretty expensive to be carried out.
Finally, in contrast to reading passage claiming that because the natural habitats of the frogs are threatened, these animals are in decline and human activities like excessive water use or draining of wetlands caused their habitats to be extinct, the lecturer disagrees and contends that the main reason for water land disappearance is the global warming.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22344322344 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70321232385 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.4951184592 49.2860985944 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.714285714 110.228320801 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 21.698381199 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5714285714 7.06452816374 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433461516971 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201571210129 0.0996497079465 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771644433171 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255410093314 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479738963151 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.3589403974 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 53.8541721854 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.