TPO 19- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
In this century, technology advancement opens up different opportunities for people to get informed about the current events from various methods. When it comes to being well-informed about the news, controversy surrounds the issue of whether people should obtain the report from different resources or not? I am of the opinion that getting news from many resources is more beneficial, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
One of the remarkable aspects of the ongoing discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that getting news from different sources will help us to judge current news base on more real notions. In fact, today, people are infected by several fake news which initiated from some unknown sources to trigger emotional and political awareness. This news always targets youngsters and ordinary citizens to attract them to some false beliefs or organizations. My sister, for instance, is a great fan of political news and she has voted based on the criticism of some people talking in these programs. Therefore, I believe that these false impressions from some biased channels can spoil people's mind. As a matter of fact, they only support their owner's political views, and this might be dangerous for people to just trust on one source of the news.
Another noticeable aspect of the topic which needs to be reflected is that more data often assist individual's mind to think deeply. If people acquire news from many resources, they might comprehend the real story behind this event. In most of the cases, the story is extremely abstruse to understand, and we may require a further complementary information to digest it. To illustrate, perhaps my experience can shed more light on this matter. When I was in high school, I did not realize the meaning of some political terms and people were talking around about these words. Especially, while I was reading the news on the newspaper, it was like a jungle of mysteries, and I was the Alice in this Wonderland. However, thanks to the internet, I found some alternative resources with simpler jargons to understand these terms.
Paradoxically, there are some justifications from the one who argues that gathering news from different sources would be a time and money wasting procedure. In essence, finding various news resources is not easy, and also we have to pay for most of them. For instance, as there are several newspaper companies, most of which with different viewpoints, you need to spend a fortune to get all of them at the same time. Hence, the more you want to be informed, the more you have to pay and spend your time.
Taking into consideration all the points mentioned above, I am pretty convinced that there are many solid reasons to support the idea of getting news from different resources because we can judge the story regarding getting more perspectives, and also we can obtain the profound meaning of the report. Meanwhile, it may have some expenses like being timely and costly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind thinking'.
Suggestion: mind thinking
...that more data often assist individuals mind to think deeply. If people acquire news from man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.026 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76513363149 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5612045875 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.227272727 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233068599703 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704569405869 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532659708407 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145102098127 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055300847839 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.