It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.Include any relevant examples from your experience

Essay topics:

It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.

Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.

Include any relevant examples from your experience

The families are the sub sets of larger community. The level of bond among the family members have reduced in the contemporary world compared to past era. The main causes for this trend are increasing cost of living and technological advancements. These should be managed proactively to establish the lost attractions among the family members again.

Firstly, the cost of living is sky rocketing compared to disposable income of an individual. This had forced working population to work hard and even extra hours to earn more money for the survival. This have off set the propotion of their valuable time available to spend with their loved ones. Further, this will increase their stress level and impact their living standards. Therefore, the concrete relationship between spouse and children will be affected.

Secondly, the technological advancements in this present context have been a curse to the family relationship. For example, the family members does not even interact with their spouse and toddlers during leisure hours, rather spend time in social media and mobile phones. As a result, the communication and attraction also have been deteriorated in recent times.

However, these should be managed effectively to regain the bonding among the families. Adding to that, people should have a proper work life balance. For instance, the family people could go out for a day trip during weekends. More importantly, they should at least sit together and have dinner daily, while putting all these technological devices aside and share love and care among each other.

When all the above are considered, apart from the developments in this modern world, it have been detrimental to the family bond. This will negatively affect the development of the future generation. Hence, these factors should be managed with due care to re-establish the lost love and care among the family establishment.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ontemporary world compared to past era. The main causes for this trend are increasi...
^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'offed'.
Suggestion: offed
... more money for the survival. This have off set the propotion of their valuable tim...
^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d share love and care among each other. When all the above are considered, apart...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...e developments in this modern world, it have been detrimental to the family bond. Th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, at least, for example, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30363036304 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77479062554 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57095709571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2917316007 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.5789473684 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145647914251 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482822993371 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347772780394 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902594775089 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337694437605 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.